So, up until this point those who find themselves steering the Islamic- Progressive alliance were under the impression that they could operate policies, within which, Islamic terrorists could mount an increasing number of terror attacks on the host society, whilst the guardians of the progressive narrative would deflect responsibility and maintain victim status for Muslims.
This new norm of accepting terror incidents as ‘part and parcel of living in a modern society’ suited both parties in their shared ultimate goal – the destruction of the traditional societal model. However, this model is not to be applied in the case of blowback from the target society.
Like the boiled frog, the domestic population were to be kept inactive by an ideologically subversive narrative and coercively silenced whilst the temperature of the water was slowly increased.
However, there comes a point where some of the frogs slowly being boiled realize what is happening and try to save themselves.
In 1942, British Air Chief Marshall, Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris referenced a biblical quote (Hosea 8:7) when he made a radio broadcast to announce the RAF’s first thousand bomber raid on Germany.
“The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them. After Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they have put that rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.”
Up until this one response to now countless Islamic terror attacks across Europe, the permitted response has been to employ hashtags; wash our profile pictures & offer instantly discardable thoughts and prayers.
Now there has been an attack on a group, who had until this point had been dolling out almost relentless violence, that response is suddenly no longer enough. Now we need to ‘crush the poison narrative’; we need sweeping laws to protect Muslims, so that they can continue to ideologically support extremists without interference or fear for their safety.
Today, Julie Lenarz in the relatively sober Telegraph argues that Failing to confront far-right terrorism will only embolden the other barbarians among us. Er, no Julie, confronting and tackling Islamic extremism is where we need to focus our energy. Scores of attacks across Europe, and we need to tackle the mindset behind one response? That is some perverse logic you’re afflicted with there.
There is no attempt to understand why something like this happened; no attempt to disassociate the actions of one from a broader group; no mercy in their words this morning for those they see has holding unacceptable views; views they clearly find more disturbing than the ideology behind the frequency of Islamic terror attacks we are now being asked to accept as ‘normal.’
Meanwhile, in the real world of actions and consequences, as if treating the host society to near relentless terror attacks was ever going to play out well for a group that makes up 5% of the population.
Not all Muslims are extremists or support such actions, but a significant minority believe things that are incompatible with a functioning liberal democracy.
I lived in Finsbury Park for many years. Finsbury Park mosque was notorious a hornet’s nest of extremism & then home to hate preacher, Abu Hamsa before his extradition to the U.S. on terror charges.
It was so infamous, that visiting football fans being escorted to the nearby Arsenal ground of Highbury would shout abuse at the intimidating group who would hold prayers on the pavement under the watchful eye of Hamsa.
Abu Hamsa leading prayers outside Finsbury Park mosque
It’s very hard to feel sory for such people. And Finsbury Park mosque could be considered a high value target. However, the mosque that was attacked was across the street, and so the suspicion is that the attacker confused the two.
London mayor Sadiq Khan & Labour’s Diane Abbott were declaring it a ‘terrorist attack’ within hours; something for which ideological motive needs to be present; something they were both very reluctant to do when the assailants were from the religion of special needs.
The speed with which they have declared intent and aportioned blame to Islamafauxbia should be noted. We would be very interested to know what sort of phobia Islamic terrorist suffer from. Of course, I am being disingenuous, Islamic terrorists are not treated to the same ideological vilification by the left.
None of this should come as any surprise. Once again we see the same alliance – Islam & the left sharing the same narrative; actively targeting any resistence to the now endless orgy of Islamic violence across Europe, and ultimately sharing the same goal: the undermining of structured and functioning Western societies.
‘As the traditions of the nation fade and lose meaning, so does its will to defend itself to survive’
W. August Mayer
Islamic Jihad, Cultural Marxism and the Transformation of the West
When I was about 11, there was a novel published entitled, The Churchill Commando. It was the late 1970’s, IRA terrorism was at its height and football violence had become engrained within the fabric of society.
When it was released, the Churchill Commando, which centred around the activities of a right wing death squad, was pawed with by the tabloid press as a fantasy panacea to the ills of the day.
As someone who lived in the U.K. through the full span of The Troubles as they became affectionately known, our current battle with Islamic terror is so much more serious and concerning. Because unlike the Irish nationalists, there is no political solution we can offer these people; nothing will satisfy them short of complete subjugation under an Islamic Caliphate. But also more worringly, Western societies no longer possess the resolve or means by which to defend themselves, never mind defeat such an enemy. Modern politicians and societies have been left ideological demoralized and all but defenceless due to decades of exposure to cultural Marxism.
In the 1970’s the British government fought a brutal and messy war against Republican terrorists both in Ireland and on the mainland. It was a protracted clandestine war of terror which included political assassinations; pub bombing; snipers and IED’s.
The British army operated an offensive front in N. Ireland via special forces units and through Unionist organizations such as the Ulster Voulenteer Force (UVF) & Ulster Defence Association (UDA). These units would be fed intelligence on Republican operatives & would be supplemented with army personnel, which would then target and assassinate active IRA members. For a number of years the British government also operate an internment policy, whereby nationalist operatives and activists could be detained on the basis of intelligence alone.
This is the sort of war we will need to fight against domestic Islamic extremism in order to defeat it and erradicate it from our societies. However, things have changed since the 1970’s; our societies are a perfect reflection of the hang-wringing cucked man-bitches they seem determined to produce, and so you have to wonder whether we are capable of winning such a fight?
An Enemy Within
It turns out that the Manchester Arena suicide bomber attended a radical local moque where his brother was a preacher; his dad was a fundraiser and Al Qaeda affiliate, and the family had just returned from a holiday to the jihadi playground formerly known as Libya. This family, who were first offered a home in Britain as they fled Gaddafi’s regime, not only betrayed every law of hospitality and gratitude, but they all should have been well on the radar of the security services.
Last night’s Islamic terror attack in South London, employed the more crude methods already hallmarked by ISIS operatives – vehicles and knives, but no doubt they will have been nurtured in communities that shared their ideology and received support from others not yet identified.
A recent ICM poll revealled that a staggering 66% of British Muslims would not inform the authorities of a terror plot. Which raises another issue: these bombers do not exist in isolation; statistics show that the communities they come from support them in alarming numbers on a series of issues associated with Islamic radicalization.
These operatives, like any other military set up, are merely the business end supported by other extremists who share their ideology of intolerance and subjugation of host societies through violence.
Islam is rotten with violence, from the teachings and example set by the Prophet during his life, to the action of the South London attackers.
So we should not be surprised then these things happen. We have invited in a killer to dine with our family, whilst our politicians lie about the nature and intention of our guest.
Crossing The Rubicon
At this stage, a political will is required to defend & save our societies.
It’s either targeted hits, internment & deportation, as we saw in Northern Ireland in the 1970’s, or it’s Bosnia 2.0 for our children’s generation.
There is something galling about the prospect of sending your children to war to save the society of people who continue to support Islamic immigration despite all the evidence that it will eventually kill them.
Conversely, Islamists in Britain fail to appreciate how bad this could get for their communities very quickly. At approximately 4% of the population, any civil conflict is certain eradication. They are afforded a sense of immunity and safety by an ideologically imposed culture of seemingly infinate tolerance.
Just under the surface, however, is a tribal culture of brutality and a military wing that perfected paramilitary warfare during the 30 year war against the IRA. They know who they are, and they know where they live. That’s all they need. This is how business is done once you get to this level.
Theresa May now needs to let the dogs off the chain and give these guys a mauling, otherwise nationalist paramilitary warfare awaits.
Anyone who suggests that Cultural Marxism is a fabrication of the right, needs to see this film made in 1985, in which ex-KGB officer, Yuri Bezmenov details the strategy and methods behind what he describes as ‘Ideological Subversion.’
You have to wonder what Bezemov would make of the death spiral Western culture now finds itself in, with slut walks; gender pro nouns; race as a construct and ‘Islamaphobia.’
And whilst our Western liberal democracies are no longer capable of defending themselves due to the ideological rot which Cultural Marxism has spawned (a rot almost entirely epitomized by the world view of Canada’s Justin Trudeau), former Soviet Bloc European leaders have no problem identifying and resisting the utter lunacy of such thinking.
If Islamic terror attacks serve one purpose, it is to highlight what a pathetic specimen Western civilization has become after decades of cultural Marxism & political correctness have ground us down to a pith of emasculated self-loathing and insecurity.
The sum total of our permissible response to yet another attack from an enemy within, and whom we continue to welcome onto our shores in increasing numbers, is to wash our social media profile picture with the relevant flag and speak of our surprise & non-specific sadness at another act of predictable violence at the hands of an enemy whose name cannot be uttered.
For anyone outside of this paradigm, this borders upon a collective mental illness of cult proportions. Our inability to even identify the threat means that we have little chance of addressing it, and absolutely no chance of defeating it. Which in turn inevitably leads to a state of resignation, as we have to admit that after decades of dismantling our societies from within, cultural Marxism & political correctness have left our societies unable to respond, let alone defend a civilization that has been crafted with blood and reason over a thousand years to provide a societal model that others have sought to adopt and emulate.
It’s truly appalling what we have become, but it was by design, not accident.
After over six months of pimping their alternate reality in an attempt to undermine & unseat Trump, the Democrats’ Russian narrative has managed to reach terminal velocity without any fuel. It is quite a feat really when you think about it.
Narratives without evidence are propaganda; lies brought to life and given credibility merely through the act of repeating them, as we have seen Demococrats and the MSM do incessantly for the past 6 months.
In fact, the blanket coverage CNN continues to provide this story should be embarrasing; they are not journalists at this stage, they are errand boys whose diet seems to now exclusively consist of burgers, soda & Deep State sperm.
Opposition to this assertion is not helped by a recent Harvard University report into Media bias over the Trump campaign and subsequent presidency. The figures are truly shocking and led Tucker Carlson to declare that there was more diversity of press opinion in Ceauscescu’s Romania. (Ouch)
“Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”, is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels. Among psychologists something like this known as the “illusion of truth” effect. Read More
In contrast, last night on Carlson’s Show, Davis Hanson soberly laid out what we know for sure: that he Trump Russian narrative was created during the nomination process by Never Trump Republicans, who commissioned a report compliled by a British ex-intelligence agent. After Trump got the nomination, it was passed on to the Clinton campaign and forgotten about… until she lost that is. Then it was resurrected and employed as an excuse, after which, it somehow ended up in the hands of the FBI Director and leaked to media sources. Et voila: Trump is a Russian agent.
Over recent months, Zerohedge have been running an increasing number of article dedicated to the overheated Canadian real estate market and the sureal conditions such temperatures have created.
Well, last week the alarm bells started ringing as it was announced that Home Capital Group, Canada’s largest independant mortgage provider, was in trouble and required a bail out of $2 billion. This news resulted in a one day drop in the share value of a staggering 60%, and 71% overall.
Home Capital Group cratered by over 60%, its biggest drop on record, after the company disclosed that it struck an emergency liquidity arrangement for a C$2 billion ($1.5 billion) credit line to counter evaporating deposits at terms that will leave the alternative mortgage lender unable to meet financial targets, and worse, may leave it insolvent in very short notice.
And they weren’t alone…
So where did this $2 billion bailout come from? This is where it gets interesting.
One day later, it emerged that the lender behind HCG’s (pre-petition) rescue loan was none other than the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP). As Bloomberg reported, the Toronto-based pension plan – which represented more than 321,000 healthcare workers in Ontario – gave the struggling Canadian mortgage lender the loan to shore up liquidity as it faces a run on deposits amid a probe by the provincial securities regulator. Home Capital had also retained RBC Capital Markets and BMO Capital Markets to advise on “strategic options” after it secured the loan.
Why did HOOPP put itself, or rather its constituents in the precarious position of funding what is a very rapidly melting ice cube? The answer to that emerged when we learned that HOOPP President and CEO Jim Keohane also sits on Home Capital’s board and is also a shareholder.
But it got worse for HCG:
On Thursday we observed that as concerns about HCG’s viability mounted, depositors were quietly pulling their funding from from savings accounts at subsidiary Home Trust. By Wednesday, when Home Capital revealed it was seeking a $2-billion loan to backstop its sinking savings deposits, shareholders ran for the exits, driving down the company’s share price by 65 per cent on Wednesday alone, and heightening the sense of panic.
On Friday, the company revealed that high-interest savings account balances fell another 36% to $521-million by Friday morning, down by a whopping $293 million from $814-million Thursday and more than $2-billion a month ago.
Considering the lack of reporting on any of this in the MSM, you’d be forgiven for thinking that this was all taking place in an alternate dimension.
But don’t expect CBC or CTV to share this news with you any time soon; they will keep this boat afloat and the illusion of stability going as long as they can.
But there is another concerning aspect to this story: Canadian household debt
A whopping 31% of respondents said they already don’t make enough to meet all their financial obligations.
It would appear that in order to afford their increasingly expensive standard of living, Canadians have been forced to take on an unprecedented level of debt, with little understanding of how it really works.
Roughly 60 per cent of respondants said they don’t have a firm grasp of how interest rates affect debt repayments.
Well, let us explain:
A decision by the BoC to start lifting its key policy rate from historic lows would raise the cost of carrying debt across the country. A one percentage point rise in the BoC’s key interest rate would likely push up variable mortgage rates by a similar amount. A variable mortgage rate that’s currently set at 3 per cent, for example, would go up to 4 per cent, which represents a 33 per cent increase in interest payments for the mortgage holder. That’s an extra $83 a month for every $100,000 in outstanding mortgage debt.
It would appear that many Canadaians are so highly leveraged, that even a modest hike in interest rates would shake many of those hands from the tree. And this combination of household debt and an overheated housing market leaves the Canadian economy on the verge of a housing and debt crisis, the likes of which we last saw south of the border in 2008.
Credit ratings agency Moody’s Investors Service downgraded Canada’s big six banks on Wednesday evening, citing concerns about soaring household debt and housing prices.
In what is being reported as the lowest turn out for years, ‘independant’ candidate, Emmanuel Macron has secured victory to become the next President of France.
It would appear that French voters were nonplussed by the choice offered them, with 35% opting to stay home rather than engage.
Clearly, there has not been enough Islamic immigration or violence to force a change just yet. Which is obviously a shame, because it now means that French society must be subjected to at least another five years of increasing terror attacks from an enemy within, whilst their chosen leader continues with the same culture of denial and serving the interests of others.
As we recently covered, Macron turns out to be a rather mysterious and puzzling political choice, coming out of litteraly nowhere to become president of the republic. If you were one of those people who questioned Donald Trump’s lack of political experience, you are gonna love this guy’s ‘unsuitability’.
Because, it’s only when you start looking at Macron’s resume, that you start to get an idea of who put him where he is now, and who he will be looking after the interests of first and foremost.
As Paul Joseph Watson reports:
Citizens whose children are mowed down by the truck or the gun, will be at the back of the queue for Macron; he serves federalist and globalist masters, so France can expect more immigration and we can all expect more E.U. as they double down on the project in light of Brexit.
However, as Daniel Hannan points out in his column today,
Le Pen would be a disaster – and she’s not even Right-wing. Let’s get one thing clear at the outset, Marine Le Pen is not “far-Right”. She is not, in any meaningful sense, Right-wing at all. She wants wealth taxes, higher social spending, limited working hours, worker control of companies, tariffs.
The garrulous agitator is Right-wing only in the BBC sense of “baddie” – a designation which the corporation applies to everyone from the revolutionary ayatollahs in Iran to the Stalinist nostalgics in Russia.
So whilst, Le Pen’s policies aren’t what you would consider conservative – they are fairly socialist actually, she is a nationalist. And nowadays the only choice being offered is between nationalism and globalism. Either the nation state is destroyed by globalists using federalism and coercive engineered migration, or it is preserved by nationalists.