The Dry Shave Show 127: Warren Commission to Investigate Vegas Shootings

This week Ivan & Byron discuss the Mandalay Bay shooting in Vegas; ISIS; Alex Jones; Trump’s Twitterstorm; Rex Tillerson; Miley Cyrus & Hillary Clinton on Jimmy Fallon; U.K crackdown on extremist material & Byron’s recent trip to 80’s Florida.

Full Podcast



Charlottesville & Domestic Terrorism

In the wake of the Charlottesville violence and the attack involving a car being driven into a crowd of Antifa & BLM protesters, there have been calls for the groups involved in Saturday’s Unite The Right demonstration against the removal of the statue of General Lee in Charlottesville to be declared domestic terrorists.

The Case for Domestic Terrorism

As when Islamists use vehicles as weapons, any act of mass violence that is ideologically driven could be classed as domestic terrorism. However, in order to have the groups associated with the Unite The Right march, declared domestic terrorists, by that standard, those calling for such a move would have to accept Black Lives Matter & Antifa also being declared domestic terrorist organizations. Or risk exposing transparent bias and deteriorating the situation further into open civil war.

Black Lives Matter & Antifa: Domestic Terrorist Organizations

Both Black Lives Matter & Antifa have a well established history of using violence and intimidation to further their cause. Both groups have a track record of calling for dead cops; dead fascists etc. and the forcible silencing of voices they do not agree with. This side of Islamic terror, there are no better examples of domestic terror organizations in modern America than BLM & Antifa.

Antifa have been plying their trade as violent leftist street thugs all but unchallenged for the past year. All anyone had to do to be the focus of this violence was to turn up to speak at a university. People attending such events have been beaten unconscious; pepper sprayed; spat on and ultimately prevented from hearing the speaker, in contravention of their Constitutional right, by an organized group who exclusively use violence & intimidation to achieve their ideological goals.

 1. the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Black Lives Matter also boasts an extensive body count to support their membership of this club. After openly calling for the death of police officers during demonstrations, adherents of the cause have ambushed and killed scored of U.S. police officers since. There seems little point at this stage arguing against their inclusion as a domestic terrorist organization. The only question really should be: why are they still operating?

Soros & the Democratic Party: Sponsors of Domestic Terrorism 

The one thing both groups have in common is that they are in receipt of financial support from George Soros, and the tacit support of both the mainstream media and Democratic party.

Soros is the main funder of some 200 leftist groups, including Planned Parenthood,, and Black Lives Matter.

Soros also backs self-proclaimed antifascist groups—this year the Soros-backed group Alliance for Global Justice gave $50,000 to the militant thugs associated with the group Refuse Fascism. Read Full Article 

Whilst Black Lives Matter directly received $650 Million via Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Hacked Documents show that Soros funded Black Lives Matter 

Democratic Party Terrorism

James Hodgkinson, the shooter of Republican House Majoiry Whip, Steve Scalise and three others, first identified and then shot the Republicans at a baseball game in Virginia earlier this year for no other reason their political affiliation to the Republican party. It was an ideologically driven act of mass violence (terrorism).

Hodgkinson was a supporter of Bernie Saunders. And whilst it would be unconvincing to lay the blame for that act of domestic terrorism on Sanders, it is not unreasonable to claim that the current culture of political violence was fermented & initiated by the Democratic Party – starting with the orchestration of violence at Trump rallies, which were planned & organized by Democratic Party operatives and paid for by George Soros.

James O’Keefe of Project Vertitas expose Democratic Party operatives orchestrating violence at Trump rallies.

Democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi & Maxine Waters have not only consistently failed to denounce leftist violence against Trump and his supporters; they have infact poured fuel on such violence with their violent rhetoric. Likewise, when CNN describes a Black Lives Matter as ‘activists’, they legitimize the culture of violence the left currently enjoys.

The Democratic Party; George Soros & the liberal media are currently organizing; financing & legitimizing domestic terrorism in America.

If they are going to cast the domestic terrorism net and label right wing groups, ‘terrorist organizations’, the failure to include left wing groups with a much more convincing track record for the label, would do nothing but prepare the ground for a broader and expanding civil conflict.

Paul Joseph Watson on Awful Architecture

Above: Boston City Hall, “the callous abomination” as per Paul Joseph Watson.

He’s talking (generally) about the defacement of British cities, of course, but the shoe fits 99% of Vancouver architecture as well:

I shit you not, that photo comes from an article on the “finest” of new Vancouver architecture.

LOL… I guess in the sense of “less ugly than Simon Fraser University’s Stalinist beige concrete blocks” but by that standard most prisons are also fine architecture.

Note: I grew up in Richmond, BC. As a kid we had wide open vistas framed by the North Shore and Cascade mountains right from the end of the driveway past the trees. Now at the end of the driveway of the house I grew up in, the mountains are obliterated by hideous condo towers and on the property itself, the views are of condos and townhouses.

So glad I moved somewhere more rural. I got my mountain view back from the end of the driveway, and on the property, the only thing hiding the mountains are the trees.

The nice thing about moving to the far fringes of a small backwater town where the principal industry is a pulp mill is that no one has the money to buy such, er, “taste” and if they do want dreary industrial chic, they can just follow the belching smoke to its source and get their fill of ugly utilitarianism. And the mill has kindly left a perimeter strip of forest surrounding their property so you only see it down its driveway.

Because they have the decency to know their building is butt-ugly and therefore to hide it somewhat, as opposed to all that brutalist architecture that can’t abide a single tree for fear of someone not having to look at it.

Perhaps one day when the stinky mill closes and gets replaced with a tacky casino/golf resort we’ll be blessed by such architectural excellence, but I still won’t have to see it thanks to the above-mentioned trees.

Related: Roger Scruton in an old BBC documentary called “Why Beauty Matters”:

Camille Paglia on Trump, liberals, transgenders, and jihad

New interview with Camille Paglia in the Weekly Standard, in which she delves into the current derangement of our society and the media complicity thereof… plus why Trump won and will keep on winning as the Democrats keep on whining.


On Trump’s detractors:

There seems to be a huge conceptual gap between Trump and his most implacable critics on the left. Many highly educated, upper-middle-class Democrats regard themselves as exemplars of “compassion” (which they have elevated into a supreme political principle) and yet they routinely assail Trump voters as ignorant, callous hate-mongers. These elite Democrats occupy an amorphous meta-realm of subjective emotion, theoretical abstractions, and refined language. But Trump is by trade a builder who deals in the tangible, obdurate, objective world of physical materials, geometry, and construction projects, where communication often reverts to the brusque, coarse, high-impact level of pre-modern working-class life, whose daily locus was the barnyard. It’s no accident that bourgeois Victorians of the industrial era tried to purge “barnyard language” out of English.


On the the liberal non-reactions to jihadism:

Citizens have an absolute right to demand basic security from their government. The contortions to which so many liberals resort to avoid connecting bombings, massacres, persecutions, and cultural vandalism to Islamic jihadism is remarkable, given their usual animosity to religion, above all Christianity.


On transgenders:

I am highly skeptical about the current transgender wave, which I think has been produced by far more complicated psychological and sociological factors than current gender discourse allows. Furthermore, I condemn the escalating prescription of puberty blockers (whose long-term effects are unknown) for children. I regard this practice as a criminal violation of human rights.

… Biology has been programmatically excluded from women’s studies and gender studies programs for almost 50 years now. Thus very few current gender studies professors and theorists, here and abroad, are intellectually or scientifically prepared to teach their subjects.


Read the whole thing here.

Islamic Terror: Let Loose The Dogs of War

When I was about 11, there was a novel published entitled, The Churchill Commando. It was the late 1970’s, IRA terrorism was at its height and football violence had become engrained within the fabric of society.

When it was released, the Churchill Commando, which centred around the activities of a right wing death squad, was pawed with by the tabloid press as a fantasy panacea to the ills of the day.

The Churchill Commando by Ted Willis

As someone who lived in the U.K. through the full span of The Troubles as they became affectionately known, our current battle with Islamic terror is so much more serious and concerning. Because unlike the Irish nationalists, there is no political solution we can offer these people; nothing will satisfy them short of complete subjugation under an Islamic Caliphate. But also more worringly, Western societies no longer possess the resolve or means by which to defend themselves, never mind defeat such an enemy. Modern politicians and societies have been left ideological demoralized and all but defenceless due to decades of exposure to cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism has left us defenceless to Islam

In the 1970’s the British government fought a brutal and messy war against Republican terrorists both in Ireland and on the mainland. It was a protracted clandestine war of terror which included political assassinations; pub bombing; snipers and IED’s.

The British army operated an offensive front in N. Ireland via special forces units and through Unionist organizations such as the Ulster Voulenteer Force (UVF) & Ulster Defence Association (UDA). These units would be fed intelligence on Republican operatives & would be supplemented with army personnel, which would then target and assassinate active IRA members. For a number of years the British government also operate an internment policy, whereby nationalist operatives and activists could be detained on the basis of intelligence alone.

This is the sort of war we will need to fight against domestic Islamic extremism in order to defeat it and erradicate it from our societies. However, things have changed since the 1970’s; our societies are a perfect reflection of the hang-wringing cucked man-bitches they seem determined to produce, and so you have to wonder whether we are capable of winning such a fight?

An Enemy Within

It turns out that the Manchester Arena suicide bomber attended a radical local moque where his brother was a preacher; his dad was a fundraiser and Al Qaeda affiliate, and the family had just returned from a holiday to the jihadi playground formerly known as Libya. This family, who were first offered a home in Britain as they fled Gaddafi’s regime, not only betrayed every law of hospitality and gratitude, but they all should have been well on the radar of the security services.

Last night’s Islamic terror attack in South London, employed the more crude methods already hallmarked by ISIS operatives – vehicles and knives, but no doubt they will have been nurtured in communities that shared their ideology and received support from others not yet identified.

A recent ICM poll revealled that a staggering 66% of British Muslims would not inform the authorities of a terror plot. Which raises another issue: these bombers do not exist in isolation; statistics show that the communities they come from support them in alarming numbers on a series of issues associated with Islamic radicalization.

66% of British Muslims wouldn’t tell authorities about a terror plot. 

Why the ICM poll shows we need to defend our values more than ever.

These operatives, like any other military set up, are merely the business end supported by other extremists who share their ideology of intolerance and subjugation of host societies through violence.

Islam is rotten with violence, from the teachings and example set by the Prophet during his life, to the action of the South London attackers.

So we should not be surprised then these things happen. We have invited in a killer to dine with our family, whilst our politicians lie about the nature and intention of our guest.

Crossing The Rubicon

At this stage, a political will is required to defend & save our societies.

It’s either targeted hits, internment & deportation, as we saw in Northern Ireland in the 1970’s, or it’s Bosnia 2.0 for our children’s generation.

There is something galling about the prospect of sending your children to war to save the society of people who continue to support Islamic immigration despite all the evidence that it will eventually kill them.

Conversely, Islamists in Britain fail to appreciate how bad this could get for their communities very quickly. At approximately 4% of the population, any civil conflict is certain eradication. They are afforded a sense of immunity and safety by an ideologically imposed culture of seemingly infinate tolerance.

Just under the surface, however, is a tribal culture of brutality and a military wing that perfected paramilitary warfare during the 30 year war against the IRA. They know who they are, and they know where they live. That’s all they need. This is how business is done once you get to this level.

Theresa May now needs to let the dogs off the chain and give these guys a mauling, otherwise nationalist paramilitary warfare awaits.

Obama’s New Low: Pimping for the E.U.

Whilst some might still be puzzled by the former U.S. President’s recent plea to French voters to cast their vote for Emmanuel Macron, the almost transparent desperation is visible for all.

The first obvious question is: why should an ex U.S. President care who wins the French election, and secondly: what business is it of his anyway?

But this is not the first time Barry has directly tried to effect a foreign election.

Barack Obama: Britain must vote to remain in the European Union

Barack Obama has urged Britain to stay in the European Union, saying that the sacrifice of his country’s soldiers during the Second World War means America has a stake in the referendum debate. Read More

As we reported at the time, during the Brexit campaign, both Obama and Canada’s Trudeau made public statements supporting the campaign for Britain to remain in the E.U. Brexit: Farage Gets Busy Smaking Bitchez Around

Which surely falls within the sphere of meddling in a foreign election? Not cool according to Barry’s Democrats. However, unlike the Russian hacking allegations – for which there has to date, been no evidence provided to support the allegations, Barry has provided us with video testimony of his cringeworthy attempted meddling. And if this is what’s happening on the surface, you have to wonder what else was going on behind the scenes?

Let’s be clear, Barry who just took $400,000 for a speech to a Wall St. firm, is now transparently pimping an E.U federalist message with the all the class and conviction of a hockey player selling tyres.

To argue that he is anything but an errand boy for the globalist agenda seems futile.

Importing Islam: The Case For Treason

At this stage, no one needs to make the case against Islamic immigration, that was ten years ago. Nowadays, the case makes itself.

Today we make the case for treason.

Progressive politicians like Merkel, Trudeau, Obama, Hollande & Blair, who serve the open borders globalist model above the interests of those who elected them, must know that when power is finally wrestled from them, there’s a good to firm chance they will find themselves on trial for treason.

The ideological hubris that consumes this current generation of leaders suggests that a crisis point will be required before our societies can be rescued, and in reaching that point it appears almost inevitable now that there will be a heavy price to pay. If so, we can expect the appetite for reckoning amongst future generations, to be ‘healthy’ to say the least.

It’s not like they had no idea what they were doing, or after a certain point, what the results of their policies would be; no one could convincingly argue that as a defence in a court. Europe is already swimming in data that demonstrates the suicidal folly of importing yet more Islam to compliment a well established culture of weekly Islamic terror.

The argument that they did not read the warning signs will not provide a defence. On the contrary, instead of failing to read the usual markers that indicate danger, they have done their best hide those markers from sight and convince their passengers that all is well despite the growing catalogue of ramdom mass murder that has nothing to do with Islam, but everything to do with its adherents.

You have to wonder how politicians like Merkel expect the decision to admit 800,000 migrants (75% male according to the U.N.) in 2015 alone, expect to escape the harsh judgement of history?

The Scientific Model

Here’s an idea: rather than test out their ideological theories on live functioning societies, the sensible thing would have been to conduct a controlled experiment under scientific conditions on a remote island. Ask for volunteers and set the duration of the study at 100 years. Establish a population ratio at 10:1 and run the model society experiment whilst studying early data results for trends.

Bearing in mind that most of those making up the domestic population of the experiment would be liberals eager to prove its success, I have no doubt that those who volunteer for this experiment will be pulling the escape chord way before then; probably 10-15 years in; with lesbians and homosexual men being the first to be extracted from the dystopian Big Brother island of progressive ideology within 1-2 years max.

These predictions might seem grandiose, but with a working knowledege of both Islam and the ideologically impaired liberal left, they are fairly easy to make.

After a hundred years, they could draw conclusions and publish their findings; after which they could sell their model for a progressive multi-cultural utopia to any functioning societies interested in adopting it.

I have no doubt that if the process was navigated in such a manner, no one would be looking to adopt their model.

The New World

From the New World’s perspective, following in the footsteps of France,Germany or Sweden is the sociological equivalent of embarking upon an experiment, when the results of other identical experiments are already available for study.

The denial of the ideologue works something like this:

‘Studies have shown that if you put a match to petrol, it explodes… ‘

‘If I do it, it’ll be different.’ 

Really? Such confidence in the face of an avalanche of evidence to the contrary. Here’s the same arrogant ideological mindset applied to another fallacy, Communism.

Here in Canada, Trudeau’s plans for the Islamization of the country are being coercively delivered with the rubber dildo of expectant decency via a viscosly patronizing media.

No other western politician gets as visibly giddy as Trudeau when he hears the word Islam, or sees a pretty girl in a niqab, or a Taliban beard in Mississauga pregnant with religious intolerance.

To many Canadians, the recent passing of M103, the anti-Islamaphobia motion, seemed like overkill, but it starts to make more sense if you view it as not being designed to address the current situation in Canada, but in preparation for what is planned – an engineered tsunami of Muslim migrants.

Mass Immigration & The Working Class.

It’s hard to understand how progressives fail to appreciate a fairly simple series of policy decisions that have led them to the point where populations are abandoning their policies and parties en masse across the western world.

In an astounding display of conceited arrogance, the progressive left within the western labour parties, including the DNC, have abandoned their traditional working class support bases in favour of a migrant class; essentially neglecting the spouse with whom they built the family in order to chase a younger mail order bride, whilst expecting the wife to remain loyal and invite the young lover in to share their home… Yeah, right buddy.

Another related issue they consistantly fail to engage on, is the effects large scale immigration has on the working poor of a country. What do they expect will happen to low paid wages with the mass importation of low skilled migrants, whose fate now falls under the law of supply and demand: with too many people chasing a few low paid jobs, wages fall. No ammount of minimum wage will stop that. In fact seeking a minimum wage whilst championing liberal immigration policies, has to be the modern definition of illogical thinking.

And so all too predictably the working classes of western progressive societies have abanadoned them for right wing nationalist parties who actually have their interests at heart.

People will continue to vote into power those necessary to save society from ‘progress’, when that progress is the disenfranchisement and de-structuring of the target culture, which they call home.

In Europe, progressive policies have sown the seeds for what now appears to be an unavoidable continental civil war that will look like Bosnia 2.0 on steroids. At this stage Europeans have two choices: either wrestle back their societies from globalist errand boys and their Islamic thugs, or they go quietly to the slaughterhouse.

Leaders and governments who want to continue with mass Islamic immigration should be forced to implement it at gunpoint and in the full knowledge that if they are unsuccessful, a trial for treason awaits.