BLM & Left Not Interested In Libyan Slave Markets

If Black Lives Matter were really interested in black lives and the legacy of slavery, surely reports of Libyan slave markets where sub-Saharan Africans can be purchased for $200-400 each, would have them mobilizing for a cause worthy of their title.

The fact that the salve markets in Libya are being run by Muslim traders and that Islam has enjoyed an unchallenged relationship with slavery for the past 1400 years is yet another indicator that Black Lives Matter aren’t really about black lives, but more about being a globalist tool in the assault on Western liberal democracy.

Libya is the gateway to Europe for Sub-Saharan African migrants. Under Ghaddafi, the route was closed; after the U.S, France, Britain & Saudi Arabia dethroned Ghaddafi in 2011 transforming the naton into a Jihadi playground full of warlords and ISIS, the flow of migrants trying to get to Europe have been both used as a weapon of war Read More and a source of live meat for slave traders.

Libya’s Slave Auctions And African Genocide: What Hillary Knew

Reports of sub-Saharan Africans being captured and sold in slave markets started emerging almost a year ago. No one on the left or in the MSM were very interested then because criticism of Islamic slavery is not part of their brief, only the western legacy. And that’s because Islam is at the top of the progressive pyramid when it comes to the damage it can inflict on a target culture or society.

However, this summer CNN were given footage of slave markets in Libya, and a subsequent investigation has provided the issue renewed broader attention.

Given the current climate of zero tolerance towards even the legacy of slavery in the West, reports that modern operational slave markets exist today in a country that we destroyed, should have the full attention of those who spent the summer tearing down statues of anyone who supported slavery 150 years ago.

Black Lives Matter & the Left don’t really care about black lives. If they did, they would have something to say about this, or addressing the slow genocide of Chicago’s black on black gun crime that takes over a thousand black lives a year.

Advertisements

Trudeau’s ‘Hug a Terrorist’ Program For Returning ISIS Fighters

 

 

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government reached a new plateau of transcendental thinking, when it announced that Canadians returning from fighting for ISIS in Syria & Iraq will be ‘re-habilitated’ rather than prosecuted or killed.

Whilst most other Western nations have stated that the only practical solution is for their domestic ISIS fighters to be killed in country and not return, the Trudeau government is offering hugs and hot chocolate to those who have been busy decapitating children in the name of Allah.

U.S. Special Envoy, Brett McGurk stated explicitly on a recent visit to Syria. “Our mission is to make sure that any foreign fighter who is here, who joined ISIS from a foreign country and came into Syria, that they will die here in Syria.”

France, too, is working to eradicate its jihadis overseas. A Wall Street Journal investigation published in May quoted French and Iraqi officials describing French special forces co-operating with Iraqi units to hunt down and kill French jihadis.

Whilst The Sunday Times reports that Britain’s Special Air Service, SAS, has been given a “kill list” of British jihadis, including notorious ISIS recruiter and convert Sally Jones.

U.K government minister Rory Stewart said “Converts who leave Britain to fight for the terror group are guilty of horrific acts and the only way of dealing with them is to kill them “in almost every case”.

Read Full Article

These countries, all of which have extensive experience at the business end of Islamic terrorism, appreciate that this is the only practical solution; to allow these people back into their countries is to expose their populations to almost certain acts of terror.

Canadian state apparatus, CBC pimped the official line dutifully when it echoed the statement made by Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale  that “Canada does not engage in death squads.”

Read Full Article

The irony that this statement should be made by a minister with the title of Public Safety Minister would be Pythonesque if it wasn’t so perverse.

Trudeau’s Liberals may find the prospect of killing Canadian Islamic fighters – which are estimated to number 200 in number – too distasteful to contemplate, but the Minister for Public Safety is clearly willing to provide safe passage for Islamic death squads returning home after defeat in Syria & Iraq, who will then be free to target Canadians at home as they have previously threatened.

None of this makes sense of course unless you are ideologically addled progressive for whom ideals trump reality and the safety of your citizens, whom you have been elected to protect and serve.

Canadians should be concerned that a rich kid like Trudeau, raised on pure ideology, should be in a position to knowingly endanger their families’ safety for the sake of a political indulgence.

If these returning Islamic fighters decide after the hugs and generous welfare offerings, that what Allah really wants is a truck attack on pedestrians, or a knife attack on shoppers, then Trudeau and his government of progressive impairment will be complicit in any deaths that follow.

Charlottesville & Domestic Terrorism

In the wake of the Charlottesville violence and the attack involving a car being driven into a crowd of Antifa & BLM protesters, there have been calls for the groups involved in Saturday’s Unite The Right demonstration against the removal of the statue of General Lee in Charlottesville to be declared domestic terrorists.

The Case for Domestic Terrorism

As when Islamists use vehicles as weapons, any act of mass violence that is ideologically driven could be classed as domestic terrorism. However, in order to have the groups associated with the Unite The Right march, declared domestic terrorists, by that standard, those calling for such a move would have to accept Black Lives Matter & Antifa also being declared domestic terrorist organizations. Or risk exposing transparent bias and deteriorating the situation further into open civil war.

Black Lives Matter & Antifa: Domestic Terrorist Organizations

Both Black Lives Matter & Antifa have a well established history of using violence and intimidation to further their cause. Both groups have a track record of calling for dead cops; dead fascists etc. and the forcible silencing of voices they do not agree with. This side of Islamic terror, there are no better examples of domestic terror organizations in modern America than BLM & Antifa.

Antifa have been plying their trade as violent leftist street thugs all but unchallenged for the past year. All anyone had to do to be the focus of this violence was to turn up to speak at a university. People attending such events have been beaten unconscious; pepper sprayed; spat on and ultimately prevented from hearing the speaker, in contravention of their Constitutional right, by an organized group who exclusively use violence & intimidation to achieve their ideological goals.

ter·ror·ism
noun
 1. the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Black Lives Matter also boasts an extensive body count to support their membership of this club. After openly calling for the death of police officers during demonstrations, adherents of the cause have ambushed and killed scored of U.S. police officers since. There seems little point at this stage arguing against their inclusion as a domestic terrorist organization. The only question really should be: why are they still operating?

Soros & the Democratic Party: Sponsors of Domestic Terrorism 

The one thing both groups have in common is that they are in receipt of financial support from George Soros, and the tacit support of both the mainstream media and Democratic party.

Soros is the main funder of some 200 leftist groups, including Planned Parenthood, MoveOn.org, and Black Lives Matter.

Soros also backs self-proclaimed antifascist groups—this year the Soros-backed group Alliance for Global Justice gave $50,000 to the militant thugs associated with the group Refuse Fascism. Read Full Article 

Whilst Black Lives Matter directly received $650 Million via Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Hacked Documents show that Soros funded Black Lives Matter 

Democratic Party Terrorism

James Hodgkinson, the shooter of Republican House Majoiry Whip, Steve Scalise and three others, first identified and then shot the Republicans at a baseball game in Virginia earlier this year for no other reason their political affiliation to the Republican party. It was an ideologically driven act of mass violence (terrorism).

Hodgkinson was a supporter of Bernie Saunders. And whilst it would be unconvincing to lay the blame for that act of domestic terrorism on Sanders, it is not unreasonable to claim that the current culture of political violence was fermented & initiated by the Democratic Party – starting with the orchestration of violence at Trump rallies, which were planned & organized by Democratic Party operatives and paid for by George Soros.

James O’Keefe of Project Vertitas expose Democratic Party operatives orchestrating violence at Trump rallies.

Democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi & Maxine Waters have not only consistently failed to denounce leftist violence against Trump and his supporters; they have infact poured fuel on such violence with their violent rhetoric. Likewise, when CNN describes a Black Lives Matter as ‘activists’, they legitimize the culture of violence the left currently enjoys.

The Democratic Party; George Soros & the liberal media are currently organizing; financing & legitimizing domestic terrorism in America.

If they are going to cast the domestic terrorism net and label right wing groups, ‘terrorist organizations’, the failure to include left wing groups with a much more convincing track record for the label, would do nothing but prepare the ground for a broader and expanding civil conflict.

Paul Joseph Watson on Awful Architecture

Above: Boston City Hall, “the callous abomination” as per Paul Joseph Watson.

He’s talking (generally) about the defacement of British cities, of course, but the shoe fits 99% of Vancouver architecture as well:

I shit you not, that photo comes from an article on the “finest” of new Vancouver architecture.

LOL… I guess in the sense of “less ugly than Simon Fraser University’s Stalinist beige concrete blocks” but by that standard most prisons are also fine architecture.

Note: I grew up in Richmond, BC. As a kid we had wide open vistas framed by the North Shore and Cascade mountains right from the end of the driveway past the trees. Now at the end of the driveway of the house I grew up in, the mountains are obliterated by hideous condo towers and on the property itself, the views are of condos and townhouses.

So glad I moved somewhere more rural. I got my mountain view back from the end of the driveway, and on the property, the only thing hiding the mountains are the trees.

The nice thing about moving to the far fringes of a small backwater town where the principal industry is a pulp mill is that no one has the money to buy such, er, “taste” and if they do want dreary industrial chic, they can just follow the belching smoke to its source and get their fill of ugly utilitarianism. And the mill has kindly left a perimeter strip of forest surrounding their property so you only see it down its driveway.

Because they have the decency to know their building is butt-ugly and therefore to hide it somewhat, as opposed to all that brutalist architecture that can’t abide a single tree for fear of someone not having to look at it.

Perhaps one day when the stinky mill closes and gets replaced with a tacky casino/golf resort we’ll be blessed by such architectural excellence, but I still won’t have to see it thanks to the above-mentioned trees.

Related: Roger Scruton in an old BBC documentary called “Why Beauty Matters”:

Camille Paglia on Trump, liberals, transgenders, and jihad

New interview with Camille Paglia in the Weekly Standard, in which she delves into the current derangement of our society and the media complicity thereof… plus why Trump won and will keep on winning as the Democrats keep on whining.

 

On Trump’s detractors:

There seems to be a huge conceptual gap between Trump and his most implacable critics on the left. Many highly educated, upper-middle-class Democrats regard themselves as exemplars of “compassion” (which they have elevated into a supreme political principle) and yet they routinely assail Trump voters as ignorant, callous hate-mongers. These elite Democrats occupy an amorphous meta-realm of subjective emotion, theoretical abstractions, and refined language. But Trump is by trade a builder who deals in the tangible, obdurate, objective world of physical materials, geometry, and construction projects, where communication often reverts to the brusque, coarse, high-impact level of pre-modern working-class life, whose daily locus was the barnyard. It’s no accident that bourgeois Victorians of the industrial era tried to purge “barnyard language” out of English.

 

On the the liberal non-reactions to jihadism:

Citizens have an absolute right to demand basic security from their government. The contortions to which so many liberals resort to avoid connecting bombings, massacres, persecutions, and cultural vandalism to Islamic jihadism is remarkable, given their usual animosity to religion, above all Christianity.

 

On transgenders:

I am highly skeptical about the current transgender wave, which I think has been produced by far more complicated psychological and sociological factors than current gender discourse allows. Furthermore, I condemn the escalating prescription of puberty blockers (whose long-term effects are unknown) for children. I regard this practice as a criminal violation of human rights.

… Biology has been programmatically excluded from women’s studies and gender studies programs for almost 50 years now. Thus very few current gender studies professors and theorists, here and abroad, are intellectually or scientifically prepared to teach their subjects.

 

Read the whole thing here.

Islamic Terror: Let Loose The Dogs of War

When I was about 11, there was a novel published entitled, The Churchill Commando. It was the late 1970’s, IRA terrorism was at its height and football violence had become engrained within the fabric of society.

When it was released, the Churchill Commando, which centred around the activities of a right wing death squad, was pawed with by the tabloid press as a fantasy panacea to the ills of the day.

The Churchill Commando by Ted Willis

As someone who lived in the U.K. through the full span of The Troubles as they became affectionately known, our current battle with Islamic terror is so much more serious and concerning. Because unlike the Irish nationalists, there is no political solution we can offer these people; nothing will satisfy them short of complete subjugation under an Islamic Caliphate. But also more worringly, Western societies no longer possess the resolve or means by which to defend themselves, never mind defeat such an enemy. Modern politicians and societies have been left ideological demoralized and all but defenceless due to decades of exposure to cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism has left us defenceless to Islam

In the 1970’s the British government fought a brutal and messy war against Republican terrorists both in Ireland and on the mainland. It was a protracted clandestine war of terror which included political assassinations; pub bombing; snipers and IED’s.

The British army operated an offensive front in N. Ireland via special forces units and through Unionist organizations such as the Ulster Voulenteer Force (UVF) & Ulster Defence Association (UDA). These units would be fed intelligence on Republican operatives & would be supplemented with army personnel, which would then target and assassinate active IRA members. For a number of years the British government also operate an internment policy, whereby nationalist operatives and activists could be detained on the basis of intelligence alone.

This is the sort of war we will need to fight against domestic Islamic extremism in order to defeat it and erradicate it from our societies. However, things have changed since the 1970’s; our societies are a perfect reflection of the hang-wringing cucked man-bitches they seem determined to produce, and so you have to wonder whether we are capable of winning such a fight?

An Enemy Within

It turns out that the Manchester Arena suicide bomber attended a radical local moque where his brother was a preacher; his dad was a fundraiser and Al Qaeda affiliate, and the family had just returned from a holiday to the jihadi playground formerly known as Libya. This family, who were first offered a home in Britain as they fled Gaddafi’s regime, not only betrayed every law of hospitality and gratitude, but they all should have been well on the radar of the security services.

Last night’s Islamic terror attack in South London, employed the more crude methods already hallmarked by ISIS operatives – vehicles and knives, but no doubt they will have been nurtured in communities that shared their ideology and received support from others not yet identified.

A recent ICM poll revealled that a staggering 66% of British Muslims would not inform the authorities of a terror plot. Which raises another issue: these bombers do not exist in isolation; statistics show that the communities they come from support them in alarming numbers on a series of issues associated with Islamic radicalization.

66% of British Muslims wouldn’t tell authorities about a terror plot. 

Why the ICM poll shows we need to defend our values more than ever.

These operatives, like any other military set up, are merely the business end supported by other extremists who share their ideology of intolerance and subjugation of host societies through violence.

Islam is rotten with violence, from the teachings and example set by the Prophet during his life, to the action of the South London attackers.

So we should not be surprised then these things happen. We have invited in a killer to dine with our family, whilst our politicians lie about the nature and intention of our guest.

Crossing The Rubicon

At this stage, a political will is required to defend & save our societies.

It’s either targeted hits, internment & deportation, as we saw in Northern Ireland in the 1970’s, or it’s Bosnia 2.0 for our children’s generation.

There is something galling about the prospect of sending your children to war to save the society of people who continue to support Islamic immigration despite all the evidence that it will eventually kill them.

Conversely, Islamists in Britain fail to appreciate how bad this could get for their communities very quickly. At approximately 4% of the population, any civil conflict is certain eradication. They are afforded a sense of immunity and safety by an ideologically imposed culture of seemingly infinate tolerance.

Just under the surface, however, is a tribal culture of brutality and a military wing that perfected paramilitary warfare during the 30 year war against the IRA. They know who they are, and they know where they live. That’s all they need. This is how business is done once you get to this level.

Theresa May now needs to let the dogs off the chain and give these guys a mauling, otherwise nationalist paramilitary warfare awaits.