The Dry Shave Show 136: Don’t You Wish Your Boyfriend Was Fash Like Me

Ivan & Byron ruminate on the full spectrum of benefits that come from living the fash life; plus Trudeau’s plans to replace the Canadian military with ISIS & an interview with The Rebel’s Ezra Levant from August 2015, in which we discuss the the rising tide of liberal intolerance and the dynamic & appeal of Trump.

Listen to the Episode


The Dry Shave Show 134: Trudeau’s Islamic Homecoming

This week Ivan & Byron meditate on Trudeau’s ‘hug a terrorist’ program for Islamic ‘travellers.’

Whilst every other Western nation has decided that their Islamic State fighters aren’t coming back, Trudeau is planning poetry workshops and arts programs for returning Canadian Jihadis.

The Dry Shave Show Episode 134: Trudeau’s Islamic Homecoming

May also contain: slam poetry; Ben Shapiro Vs Milo; Eminem & Trump; LGBTQ2S; sex with old ladies for film parts; Libyan slave markets; liberal racists; gays in the army & Black Friday.



Trudeau’s ‘Hug a Terrorist’ Program For Returning ISIS Fighters



Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government reached a new plateau of transcendental thinking, when it announced that Canadians returning from fighting for ISIS in Syria & Iraq will be ‘re-habilitated’ rather than prosecuted or killed.

Whilst most other Western nations have stated that the only practical solution is for their domestic ISIS fighters to be killed in country and not return, the Trudeau government is offering hugs and hot chocolate to those who have been busy decapitating children in the name of Allah.

U.S. Special Envoy, Brett McGurk stated explicitly on a recent visit to Syria. “Our mission is to make sure that any foreign fighter who is here, who joined ISIS from a foreign country and came into Syria, that they will die here in Syria.”

France, too, is working to eradicate its jihadis overseas. A Wall Street Journal investigation published in May quoted French and Iraqi officials describing French special forces co-operating with Iraqi units to hunt down and kill French jihadis.

Whilst The Sunday Times reports that Britain’s Special Air Service, SAS, has been given a “kill list” of British jihadis, including notorious ISIS recruiter and convert Sally Jones.

U.K government minister Rory Stewart said “Converts who leave Britain to fight for the terror group are guilty of horrific acts and the only way of dealing with them is to kill them “in almost every case”.

Read Full Article

These countries, all of which have extensive experience at the business end of Islamic terrorism, appreciate that this is the only practical solution; to allow these people back into their countries is to expose their populations to almost certain acts of terror.

Canadian state apparatus, CBC pimped the official line dutifully when it echoed the statement made by Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale  that “Canada does not engage in death squads.”

Read Full Article

The irony that this statement should be made by a minister with the title of Public Safety Minister would be Pythonesque if it wasn’t so perverse.

Trudeau’s Liberals may find the prospect of killing Canadian Islamic fighters – which are estimated to number 200 in number – too distasteful to contemplate, but the Minister for Public Safety is clearly willing to provide safe passage for Islamic death squads returning home after defeat in Syria & Iraq, who will then be free to target Canadians at home as they have previously threatened.

None of this makes sense of course unless you are ideologically addled progressive for whom ideals trump reality and the safety of your citizens, whom you have been elected to protect and serve.

Canadians should be concerned that a rich kid like Trudeau, raised on pure ideology, should be in a position to knowingly endanger their families’ safety for the sake of a political indulgence.

If these returning Islamic fighters decide after the hugs and generous welfare offerings, that what Allah really wants is a truck attack on pedestrians, or a knife attack on shoppers, then Trudeau and his government of progressive impairment will be complicit in any deaths that follow.

Black Pudding: Alt-Right Superfood









Pepe the Frog & Trash Dove, are being joined by an Alt Right superfood, Black Pudding. A traditional food found throughout Europe, it consists of a sausage made from pig’s blood, which is first boiled down and reduced after which cuts of pork fat are added. ‘Loaded with protein, potassium, calcium and magnesium, as well as being practically carb free,’ Black Pudding is being hailed as a super-food

Darren Beale from said: “2015 saw healthy eating reach a new level and this year we predict this trend is only going to get bigger. Some of the foods have been on the up for a while like avocado oil and maca root, but others like mushrooms and black pudding have been a total surprise to us.

“It’s great to have this new research available to find out the hidden qualities in food and we can’t wait to see how these new trends take off.”

At least one butcher claims to have seen a boom in sales. Lorna Maclennan, director of Stornoway’s Charles Macleod Butchers’ shop, told the Stornoway Gazette: “We have had a surge in the number of people ordering their black puddings direct, January is usually quiet, but we have had 100 orders with more coming in all the time.”

You might be scared of saying what you really think on Facebook, but you can still eat what you like.

Made from pork and pig’s blood, Black Pudding is recognized as being the most anti-Islamic food on the planet. And this could go some way to explain its renaissance amongst a growing numbers of nationalists resisting federalist tyranny & Islamic immigration within the E.U, as people’s eating habits are not currently subjected to the same coercisive control as their social media profiles.

Former UKiP leader Nigel Farage is said to consume three per day, and when Donald Trump became U.S. President, Farage is said to have presented him with a stick of weapon’s grade Lancastrian black pudding; whilst French presidential hopeful, Marine Le Pen has a slice added to smoothies.

Black Pudding in it’s natural environment.

The best way to enjoy black pudding is to serve it grilled as part of a fried English breakfast with a mandatory accompanyment of HP Sauce. At Christmas, it can also be presented as a side dish to ward off both vegan SJW’s & Islamists during the festive season. And if eaten in sufficient quantities, it produces a ‘Vampire high’ – an iron rush similar to those enjoyed by blood suckers.

Deus Vult: Black Pudding wrapped in bacon escorted by a flotilla of cocktail sausages during Christmas Day manoeuvres.

One of the most astonishing things about black pudding is that it has so far survived the current puritanical pogrom of liberal book burning and banning. You look at it and you think to yourself: how the fuck is this stuff still legal? Its mere availability in butcher’s shop windows and on the menu at cafes across the western world, is the biggest fuck you both the E.U. tyrants and Islamofascists could receive.

So eat up and enjoy. The consuming of black pudding is an act of both religious & political defiance, and any other Pope in history would be offering treasures in heaven for its mass consumption by children.

Deus Vult Bitchez!


Islam & the Media: An Anatomy of Bias

As we recently pointed out in The Progressive Pecking Order, there is a hierachical bias that’s being engineered, and last week’s Westminister Bridge Islamic terror attack in London provided an anatomy of that bias.

Whenever we are treated to yet another Islamic terror attack, often before the bodies are even cold or distant relatives have been informed, the scribes of progressive propaganda are working into the small hours of the night putting together articles warning that the potential for a backlash means that the real victims in this equation, are Muslims. Muslims at mosques linked to Khalid Masood fear anti-Islam backlashAfter the New York bomb, Muslim Americans are braced for a backlashMuslims in bombing suspect’s city safeguard community from backlash etc, etc.

Yes, because only when Muslims go on a murderous rampage, are Muslims the real victims… Because of what could happen to them if there was a backlash. Not that there ever is really. But just in case you were having any feelings of anger over yet another attack by adherents of a religion that have been given a home, the liberal media are there to make you feel so utterly ashamed of any natural feelings you might harbour, that you’ll shove them back inside yourself and feel suitably bad for ever having them.

Shame & coercion, it’s a both a bitch, and a staple.

After each attack – which we now have to count like Hollywood sequels: Paris – Charlie Hebdo; Paris 2: Bataclan; London – 7/7 etc., the liberal press rummage through their empty bag of excuses like the sniveling mother of a habitual criminal looking for a pack of tissues, ‘he’s a good boy really, just misunderstood.’

But, when on the rare occasion the gunman actually turns out to be white and the motive can be pinned anywhere near the right wing – like a tail on a donkey at a ketamine party for six year olds, – ‘anywhere near the body will do kid.’

We always hear that we shouldn’t blame the actions of an individual on the larger group they belong to. So shouldn’t we extend the same usual reluctance to tar a group for the actions of a ‘tiny minority’, to Conservatives and those on the Alt-Right? Of course not, are you fucking mad? That luxury is reserved for members of the religion of permanent offence and special needs – Islam.

What about all that stuff in the Quran about killing the unbelievers, and those who insult the prophet? They get a pass; that’s taken out of context. We don’t talk about that.

Instead we get: ‘Islam promotes peace’, or my favourite ‘Islam has nothing to do with terror’ as Hillary Clinton declared. These people have de-coupled from reality and clearly expect the rest of us to come along for the ride.

We are asked to fact check our ‘fake news’ with Buzzfeed, but never to fact check the lies we are told about Islam.

The Right’s Perceived Future Crimes

What has been introduced in its place are the hate crimes of the right in the eyes of the left. Any whiff of association and you are guilty, not only of whatever crime it is, but all society’s ills.

These crimes can even be perceived potential future crimes rather than actual real world historical examples, as in the case of Donald Trump. E.g. Trump is Hitler; he’s literally going to destroy the world; he’s going to be be impeached any day now for his racism and war crimes.

The left wasn’t interested in Hillary’s rap sheet that read like that of an inner city gangbanger, or that she was under three separate FBI investigations during her campaign. They were too busy fabricating something that could sink Trump.

Yeah, But White Christian Terrorism Is Just As Bad.

No it’s fucking not. White terrorism is a crime so rare you need a time machine to connect all the dots. I’ll help you out: Unibomber…Timothy McVeigh… Anders Breivik… Dylan Roof. Unlike Islamic terror, which requires a hand tally counter, good carpal tunnels, and lots of free time. Those guys are killing round-the-clock faster than you can count. The comparison is ludicruous and serves only to highlight the batshit insane bias that passes for reality on the left.

Fact check: In 627AD, the Prophet Mohammed oversaw the execution of 600-900 men and boys. More Details

Fact Check: Islamic scripture permits a follower to lie and deceive if the goal is the establishment of an Islamic society? More Details

Fact Check: Islam preaches peace, and that killing is wrong, but the people who cite this verse often fail to mention that this courtesy is not extended to non-Muslims. More Details

Fact Check: Non-believers living under an Islamic society are permitted three options: convert, pay protection money or die. More Details

On that reckoning, Anders Breivik is a better role model than the Prophet Mohammed.

It feels like we somewhere there was a shift in the fabric of time and now we are living in an alternate dimension, where up is down; in is out, and people who follow the teachings of a murderous warlord, are all about peace despite the mountain of stone cold evidence to the contrary.

To call Islam a religion, let alone a ‘religion of peace’, is generous at best. It’s a political system of conquest based on the deception and subjegation of host societies. I would suggest everyone learns something about what Islam actually teaches before they agree to opening the gates any further. We have a working model of the collapse mass Islamic immigration brings in France, Belgium, Sweden and Germany. What makes you think it will play out any differently in North America?

Hoping for the best in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence is recklessly dangerous. Politicians & supporters who wish to continue with such policies should be forced implement them at gunpoint. That is how hard we should make it for them to do this.